Notifications
Clear all

Why CoHER Is Building for the Future

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
63 Views
(@sahinkeskin51)
Posts: 5
Member
Topic starter
 
[#53]

The construction industry is changing faster than most people realise. Not just in the materials being used or the buildings being designed, but in the fundamental way work is organised, delivered, and understood. Building Information Modelling has replaced hand-drawn blueprints. Drones survey sites that would once have taken teams of workers weeks to assess. Sensors embedded in concrete measure structural stress in real time. Augmented reality lets architects walk clients through buildings that have not yet been built.

This is not the future. This is the construction site of today.

And yet, the workforce being trained to work on that site is still being shaped by curricula, assumptions, and cultural habits that belong to a different era. The digital transformation of construction is accelerating. The gender transformation of construction is stalling. CoHER exists at exactly that intersection — and it argues that these two transformations are not separate challenges. They are the same challenge, seen from different angles.

When a sector undergoes rapid technological change, it faces a choice. It can replicate its existing inequalities into the new digital layer — encoding the same biases into algorithms, hiring pipelines, and training programmes — or it can treat the moment of disruption as an opportunity to rebuild on more equitable foundations. CoHER makes the case for the second option, clearly and without apology.

Digital skills are not neutral. Who gets trained, in what, by whom, and in what kind of environment determines who ends up working with those skills — and who gets left behind. In construction, where women are already dramatically underrepresented, the risk of a digital transformation that simply replicates existing exclusions is real and present. A sector that fails to bring women into its digital future is not just missing a moral opportunity. It is making itself less innovative, less resilient, and less competitive.

The evidence on this is consistent: diverse teams produce better solutions. Cognitive diversity — different perspectives, different problem-solving approaches, different lived experiences — drives innovation in ways that homogeneous teams simply cannot. An all-male construction workforce designing smart buildings for a mixed population is, by definition, designing with incomplete information. Gender diversity is not a social nicety. It is an engineering advantage.

CoHER's approach to digital skills is built around this understanding. The project does not treat digital literacy as a technical add-on to an otherwise unchanged VET curriculum. It treats it as an opportunity to redesign the curriculum itself — to ask not only what skills are needed, but who is being invited to develop them, and whether the learning environment genuinely supports their participation. A training module on BIM software delivered in a classroom where female learners feel like exceptions rather than participants is not truly inclusive digital education. It is inclusion in name only.

This matters because the construction sector is at a crossroads. The green transition, the digital transition, and the demographic pressures facing Europe's workforce are converging at the same moment. The industry needs more skilled workers than it currently has. It needs workers who can operate in digitally complex environments. And it needs those workers urgently. The talent pool it has historically ignored — women — is not a future consideration. It is an immediate solution.

Innovation, at its core, is the ability to see a problem differently. CoHER is doing exactly that: looking at an industry that has long defined itself by who it excludes, and asking what it could become if it led with who it includes. The digital tools are already there. The skills frameworks exist. The funding mechanisms — through Erasmus+ and European structural programmes — are available. What CoHER is building, above all, is the will and the methodology to use them differently.

The most innovative thing the construction sector could do right now is not adopt a new technology. It is open its doors — genuinely, structurally, and permanently — to the people it has kept outside them for too long.


 
Posted : 17/06/2026 6:23 pm
Share: